In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i9-9900T is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 38% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 172 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
125 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
