In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 224 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
213 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
95%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
