In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$423.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
