In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $93 more expensive!
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 173 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-9700
- Up to 21% cheaper – $349.02 vs $442.00
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 21% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $2.02 vs $2.55/FPS
- Up to 21% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-9700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
173 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442
78%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
79%
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
172 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
99%
Price, $
$349.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-9700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-9700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
