In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-7800X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-7800X
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-7800X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$379.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-7800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-7800X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8.25 MB
52%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7800X Jun 26th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $383.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
