In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$357.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
48%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
