In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $303 more expensive!
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 months and 3 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 months and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 69% cheaper – $139.00 vs $442.00
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall – $0.66 vs $2.07/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442
31%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
32%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
98%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
