In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3320M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Core i5-3320M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-3320M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
88%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-3320M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-3320M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
75%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
