In Rust, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core i5-2500K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 229 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-2500K
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-2500K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
210 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
74%
Price, $
$162.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
