In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
94%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
