In S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl, the Core i9-9900T is slower than the Core i3-2367M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Core i3-2367M
- Up to 24% faster in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl – 134 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-2367M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-2367M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-2367M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-2367M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-2367M Oct 1st, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 1st, 2011 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
