In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Core i3-12300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-12300
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 227 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-12300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-12300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i3-12300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-12300
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12300 Jan 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 14th, 2022 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $143.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
