In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KS is faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 221 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Oct 28, 2019 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 80 vs 127 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KS vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KS
Oct 28th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KS Oct 28th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 28th, 2019 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 127 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
