In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KS is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KS
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 28, 2019
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 65 vs 127 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KS vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KS vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KS vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KS
Oct 28th, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KS Oct 28th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 28th, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 127 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
