In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-9900KS is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KS
- Is 9 months and 19 days newer – Oct 28, 2019 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 9 months and 19 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 225 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 65 vs 127 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KS vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KS vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KS vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KS
Oct 28th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KS Oct 28th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 28th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 127 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
