In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Xeon E5620
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
171 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
86%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
