In Deathloop, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
Xeon E5520
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
