In Valorant, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1285L v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Valorant – 639 vs 577 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Valorant
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Valorant FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E3-1285L v4: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
639 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
479 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E3-1285L v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon E3-1285L v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1285L v4 Jun 2nd, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $445.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
