In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $184 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 46% cheaper – $214.99 vs $399.00
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
89%
Price, $
$399
53%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
48%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
16 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
