In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-980X. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $209 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Core i7-980X
- Up to 52% cheaper – $189.95 vs $399.00
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall – $0.99 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
47%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
54%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
191 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
88%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
