In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is faster than the Core i7-930. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $92 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Core i7-930
- Up to 23% cheaper – $307.29 vs $399.00
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $1.64 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
90%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
85%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
