In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is faster than the Core i7-640M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-640M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-640M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-640M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Sep 26th, 2010 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $346.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
