In Starfield, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $96 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 5% faster in Starfield – 98 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Starfield
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 24% cheaper – $302.97 vs $399.00
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Starfield – $3.09 vs $4.29/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Starfield
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
93 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
86%
Price, $
$399
75%
Value, $/FPS
$4.29/FPS
72%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
98 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
