In Starfield, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $154 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 93 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
Core i7-10700F
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 39% cheaper – $245.00 vs $399.00
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Starfield – $2.66 vs $4.29/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Starfield
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
93 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
61%
Value, $/FPS
$4.29/FPS
62%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
92 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
98%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
