In Dead Space, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $167 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 2% faster in Dead Space – 180 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Dead Space
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 42% cheaper – $231.99 vs $399.00
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Dead Space – $1.28 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
177 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
96%
Price, $
$399
58%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
57%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$231.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
