In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $259 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-11600
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $140.00 vs $399.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Atomfall – $0.62 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
96%
Price, $
$399
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
34%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
