In Deathloop, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $196 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 49% cheaper – $203.16 vs $399.00
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Deathloop – $0.90 vs $1.78/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
223 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$399
50%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
51%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$203.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
