In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $234 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Core i5-10400F
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $165.17 vs $399.00
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall – $0.77 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
42%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
98%
Price, $
$165.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
