In GRID, the Core i9-9900KF is same performance as the Core i3-330M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $300 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Is 9 years newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 75% cheaper – $98.95 vs $399.00
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in GRID – $0.20 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
GRID FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
24%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
24%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
