In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900K is faster than the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900K
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900K vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
