In Rust, the Core i9-9900K is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 285 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 5 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 5 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900K vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
236 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
65%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 i9-9900K Octa-core [8 Core] 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 - Retail Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07KC6V4YF.jpg)
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900K vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900K vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
