In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
