In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i9-9900 is faster than the Xeon E3-1270. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900
- Up to 21% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 129 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 8 years and 20 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 8 years and 20 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270
No clear advantages
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E3-1270: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E3-1270 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Xeon E3-1270 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
