In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $270 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $229.89 vs $499.99
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$499.99
45%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
40%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
16 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
