In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $53 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 11% cheaper – $447.16 vs $499.99
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall – $1.80 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
87%
Price, $
$499.99
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
78%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$423.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
