In Rust, the Core i9-9900 is slower than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 19% faster in Rust – 278 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $476.00 vs $499.99
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Rust – $1.71 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
234 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
67%
Price, $
$499.99
95%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
80%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$423.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
