In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is same performance as the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $50 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Is 5 months and 26 days newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 months and 26 days newer
- Up to 10% cheaper – $449.98 vs $499.99
- Up to 10% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $2.07 vs $2.31/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
90%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
65W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
