In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $253 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 51% cheaper – $247.30 vs $499.99
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $1.15 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
49%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
50%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
