In Rust, the Core i9-9900 is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $193 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Up to 12% faster in Rust – 234 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Up to 39% cheaper – $307.29 vs $499.99
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in Rust – $1.47 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
61%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
69%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
68%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
