In Deathloop, the Core i9-9900 is same performance as the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $120 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
- Up to 24% cheaper – $380.00 vs $499.99
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop – $1.71 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$499.99
76%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
76%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
