In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $170 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
- Up to 34% cheaper – $329.95 vs $499.99
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 34% better value in Atomfall – $1.52 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 34% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
65%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
66%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
