In Rust, the Core i9-9900 is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $380 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 234 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 76% cheaper – $119.99 vs $499.99
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Rust – $0.53 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
23%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
25%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
90%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
