In F1 22, the Core i9-9900 is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $340 more expensive!
Core i9-9900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 1% faster in F1 22 – 360 vs 358 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in F1 22
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 68% cheaper – $159.99 vs $499.99
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in F1 22 – $0.44 vs $1.39/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in F1 22
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
358 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
249 FPS
99%
Price, $
$499.99
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
32%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
360 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
252 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
