The Core i9-9820X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $442.20 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-9820X
The Core i5-14600KF is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-14600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 71% cheaper – $178.00 vs $620.20
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
Core i9-9820X vs Core i5-14600KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
201
85%
Min 1% FPS
137
86%
Price, $
$620.2
28%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
24%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
236
100%
Min 1% FPS
160
100%
Price, $
$178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9820X vs Core i5-14600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9820X vs Core i5-14600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
71%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
69%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i5-14600KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9820X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-14600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $889.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Skylake-X | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 10 | Cores | 14 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 16.5 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
