In Atomfall, the Core i9-8950HK is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-8950HK
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 27, 2025 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-8950HK
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-8950HK Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 27th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
