In Atomfall, the Core i9-8950HK is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-8950HK
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-8950HK
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-8950HK Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
