In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-8950HK is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-8950HK
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
97%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-8950HK
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-8950HK Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
