In Atomfall, the Core i9-8950HK is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-8950HK
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-8950HK
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-8950HK Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
