In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-8950HK is slightly slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-8950HK
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-8950HK vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-8950HK
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-8950HK Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
