In Atomfall, the Core i9-7940X is slightly faster than the Xeon X5680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-7940X
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Sep 01, 2017 vs Feb 14, 2010
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Xeon X5680
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 130 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7940X vs Xeon X5680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7940X vs Xeon X5680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7940X vs Xeon X5680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7940X
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X5680
Feb 14th, 2010
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7940X Sep 1st, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5680 Feb 14th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2017 | Released | Feb 14th, 2010 |
| $1,399.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
